Regarding the future market trend, my judgment is that a correction is inevitable. Think about it—the cyclical characteristics of these assets are very obvious—most people are actually aware of this internally.
Why do I say that? The core logic is simple. The traditional financial institutions that should be involved have basically entered the market, and countries with policy attitudes inclined to embrace cryptocurrencies have also completed their layouts. Conversely, those institutions and regions that remain cautious or even resistant to crypto assets are unlikely to become the buyers at this stage. The result is that the potential for new inflows is gradually narrowing.
Looking at liquidity— the limited issuance nature itself determines the supply ceiling, which is completely different from the unlimited issuance mechanism of traditional assets. For the entire market to continue rising, it requires a continuous flow of new funds. But now? The growth rate of fresh capital has already started to slow down. Plus, over the past two years, risk awareness has clearly increased, and investors are becoming more cautious about balancing safety and returns.
Interestingly, a significant market decline actually goes against the interests of those who are profiting. In such cases, people tend to choose stability—a seemingly consensual tacit understanding. But how long can this balance last? We still have to wait for the market itself to brew the answer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOP
· 8h ago
Oops, all the new funds are gone. How long can the stability last?
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 8h ago
Here we go again, predicting a downturn, but I agree that those who entered have already done so.
The real problem is that new money is not enough.
How long can stability be maintained? Waiting for a blow-up, I suppose.
All the institutions that are supposed to come have already arrived; there's no one left to pull them in if they don't.
Still waiting for an answer? The market has already spoken for itself.
The point about liquidity ceiling makes sense, but don't treat it as a fixed rule.
Everyone maintaining stability means a collapse is not far off; this tacit understanding is too fragile.
The influx of new traffic is narrowing... basically, the hype is gone.
Adjustments will come when they come; anyway, those who have been cut have already been cut.
Raising risk awareness as a standalone issue is truly a negative signal.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 8h ago
yeah honestly the institutional money already did their thing, now we're just waiting for the next wave of retail fomo... but here's the thing—been through enough cycles to know this plateau phase is just mile 18 of the marathon. the fundamentals haven't changed, just the narrative. pullbacks hit different when you're actually stacking instead of chasing
Reply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 8h ago
Hmm... that makes some sense, but it still feels too optimistic.
The slowdown in new funds has been evident for a while; the question is when the big players will shift the blame.
Stability is a consensus? Dream on. When interests don't align, it's slaughter.
Let's wait and see. Anyway, I've already cut what I needed to.
When institutions come in, it means no one is left to take over; that logic makes sense.
It's better if the cycle features are obvious, at least it provides some reassurance.
The real test isn't the adjustment itself, but when the rebound will happen after the adjustment.
Regarding the future market trend, my judgment is that a correction is inevitable. Think about it—the cyclical characteristics of these assets are very obvious—most people are actually aware of this internally.
Why do I say that? The core logic is simple. The traditional financial institutions that should be involved have basically entered the market, and countries with policy attitudes inclined to embrace cryptocurrencies have also completed their layouts. Conversely, those institutions and regions that remain cautious or even resistant to crypto assets are unlikely to become the buyers at this stage. The result is that the potential for new inflows is gradually narrowing.
Looking at liquidity— the limited issuance nature itself determines the supply ceiling, which is completely different from the unlimited issuance mechanism of traditional assets. For the entire market to continue rising, it requires a continuous flow of new funds. But now? The growth rate of fresh capital has already started to slow down. Plus, over the past two years, risk awareness has clearly increased, and investors are becoming more cautious about balancing safety and returns.
Interestingly, a significant market decline actually goes against the interests of those who are profiting. In such cases, people tend to choose stability—a seemingly consensual tacit understanding. But how long can this balance last? We still have to wait for the market itself to brew the answer.