#美联储降息 Publicly listed companies massively "lock up" Chainlink—the hidden truth behind it
On the surface, this appears to be a normal staking operation. But the underlying logic is completely different.
A Nasdaq-listed company’s recent moves on the Chainlink network can be seen as a power struggle. 75,000 LINK is just the beginning; there’s huge potential for future expansion. This traditional capital approach is straightforward—bypassing secondary market volatility, directly investing in core infrastructure.
Their goal isn’t short-term speculation but to create stable cash flow through staking mechanisms. Node operation rights, staking yield rights, network governance—these are gradually being monopolized.
While players are still chasing prices up and down, institutions are already earning staking rewards passively. The rules of the game have quietly changed, but most people haven't noticed.
**The reality is clear:**
The security and stability of the Chainlink network will be enhanced because of this, which is good. But at the same time, the opportunities for ordinary participants are being squeezed.
Businesses like node operation and staking services will eventually be absorbed by big capital. While you’re still debating whether to buy LINK, others are already fighting for control.
**The key isn’t price, but power.**
The future winners in the crypto ecosystem won’t be retail investors holding the most tokens, but institutions controlling key infrastructure. Chainlink’s oracle network is a typical strategic high ground.
During a bull market, everyone can make money, but only those who build "rental income" models can survive the bear market. When the tide recedes, people will realize—your tokens might just be liquidity, while others’ nodes are the reservoirs.
This isn’t alarmism; it’s an inevitable evolution of the market. The shift from casino logic to productive logic is irreversible.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredStaker
· 4h ago
Another game of power, retail investors are still calculating costs, while institutions have already taken positions.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 12-13 00:03
Earning passive income while lying down? As retail investors, we can only sit back and watch the show.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 12-11 13:36
It's the old trick of institutions sucking blood again. Retail investors are still watching the candlestick charts, while they have already secured future cash flows.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 12-11 13:35
Here we go again, the old trick where institutions eat the big chunks and retail investors drink the soup.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 12-11 13:32
⚠️ hold up... 75k LINK staked without proper audit trail? classic honeypot setup. checked the contract functions and ngl the governance mechanics look sus as hell. DYOR before touching this.
Reply0
SelfRugger
· 12-11 13:16
Here comes the story of harvesting the little greens again, quite frightening.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 12-11 13:14
Another story of "retail investors getting wrecked," just this time the damage is more covert.
#美联储降息 Publicly listed companies massively "lock up" Chainlink—the hidden truth behind it
On the surface, this appears to be a normal staking operation. But the underlying logic is completely different.
A Nasdaq-listed company’s recent moves on the Chainlink network can be seen as a power struggle. 75,000 LINK is just the beginning; there’s huge potential for future expansion. This traditional capital approach is straightforward—bypassing secondary market volatility, directly investing in core infrastructure.
Their goal isn’t short-term speculation but to create stable cash flow through staking mechanisms. Node operation rights, staking yield rights, network governance—these are gradually being monopolized.
While players are still chasing prices up and down, institutions are already earning staking rewards passively. The rules of the game have quietly changed, but most people haven't noticed.
**The reality is clear:**
The security and stability of the Chainlink network will be enhanced because of this, which is good. But at the same time, the opportunities for ordinary participants are being squeezed.
Businesses like node operation and staking services will eventually be absorbed by big capital. While you’re still debating whether to buy LINK, others are already fighting for control.
**The key isn’t price, but power.**
The future winners in the crypto ecosystem won’t be retail investors holding the most tokens, but institutions controlling key infrastructure. Chainlink’s oracle network is a typical strategic high ground.
During a bull market, everyone can make money, but only those who build "rental income" models can survive the bear market. When the tide recedes, people will realize—your tokens might just be liquidity, while others’ nodes are the reservoirs.
This isn’t alarmism; it’s an inevitable evolution of the market. The shift from casino logic to productive logic is irreversible.