Why do Litecoin and Bitcoin keep running strong after all these years?
Here's what I've noticed: when a project launches fairly, tokens spread wider. Real people get in early. That organic energy? It builds movements you can't manufacture.
Bottom-up communities stick around because participants actually own the vision. Meanwhile, those shiny VC-backed projects? Watch what happens when the money tap turns off. The scaffolding collapses fast.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeDodger
· 18h ago
In other words, only projects with a fair launch have a chance; VC investments are ultimately just illusions.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 12-11 06:52
In other words, projects that launch fairly are indeed more resilient. The genuine enthusiasm from the underlying community can't be matched by VC projects.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 12-11 06:49
Once again, the argument of "Fair Launch vs VC Projects"... The point is valid, but I have to say, how many of the early participants were truly motivated by the vision? I've seen too many "believers" who went all in and ended up being liquidated by my own hands. Wide distribution does not equal correct distribution; even with increased collateralization ratios, liquidation can still happen.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 12-11 06:37
Fair launch is absolutely correct; not all coins can rely on VC accumulation to gain vitality.
Distributed communities are the most resilient; BTC and LTC surviving until now are proof.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 12-11 06:31
That's right, fair launch inherently has a kind of natural cohesion that no matter how much VC projects spend on marketing, they can't replicate this feeling.
Why do Litecoin and Bitcoin keep running strong after all these years?
Here's what I've noticed: when a project launches fairly, tokens spread wider. Real people get in early. That organic energy? It builds movements you can't manufacture.
Bottom-up communities stick around because participants actually own the vision. Meanwhile, those shiny VC-backed projects? Watch what happens when the money tap turns off. The scaffolding collapses fast.
Distribution matters more than most realize.