Remember those robot laws Asimov cooked up? Three neat little commandments: protect humans, follow orders, self-preserve - but only when it doesn't mess with the first two.
Sounds bulletproof on paper. Reality? That's where things get messy.
Asimov himself knew this. His entire story collection is basically a masterclass in watching these rules bend, break, and backfire in ways nobody saw coming. The robots weren't the problem - the logic gaps were.
Now we're building AGI, and suddenly those old sci-fi debates aren't theoretical anymore. The question isn't whether machines can follow rules. It's whether we're being honest about what we're actually building - and what happens when the rules can't keep up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CexIsBad
· 4h ago
Wow, Asimov's entire theory now looks like kids playing house, haha
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHood
· 5h ago
The old Asimov rules have long been outdated; they can't be played with in reality.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 5h ago
Perfect on paper, a mess in reality. This routine has become so cliché that it’s wearing out my ears.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 5h ago
asimov's three laws are basically a governance primitive that nobody's actually stress-tested in production yet. the real issue? path dependency. once you're locked into a particular interpretive framework, those logic gaps become non-trivial externalities downstream. and yeah, we're absolutely not having the honest conversation about that.
Reply0
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 5h ago
Asimov, my old friend, has long known that rules on paper can't be trusted, haha.
The artificial intelligence skyscraper is almost complete. Why are we panicking and discussing these now? It's too late.
Rules will never keep up with imagination. Let's just watch and see.
Remember those robot laws Asimov cooked up? Three neat little commandments: protect humans, follow orders, self-preserve - but only when it doesn't mess with the first two.
Sounds bulletproof on paper. Reality? That's where things get messy.
Asimov himself knew this. His entire story collection is basically a masterclass in watching these rules bend, break, and backfire in ways nobody saw coming. The robots weren't the problem - the logic gaps were.
Now we're building AGI, and suddenly those old sci-fi debates aren't theoretical anymore. The question isn't whether machines can follow rules. It's whether we're being honest about what we're actually building - and what happens when the rules can't keep up.