Recently, I took a look at a certain project's anti-bot measures, and they actually have quite a few tactics.
This time, they’re making significant moves: they’ve added multi-signature transaction verification at the API level, directly replaced the presale contract with a new address wtfdJKwQG9A4ayuouBEip6Hoi1DcsAAHVxeHmG5HG7E and upgraded it, and now require users to log in to participate. This combination of measures can indeed block most scripts currently on the market.
However, that being said, these protections aren’t foolproof. If someone never intended to go purely on-chain from the start and instead mixed in off-chain operations, these measures are basically ineffective. Of course, in terms of cost and effectiveness, filtering out most low-end bots is enough to achieve their goal—after all, it’s impossible to achieve 100% defense.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
retroactive_airdrop
· 13h ago
In the end, it's still impossible to stop the tough guys; a set of off-chain operations will all be pointless.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 12-08 19:58
This combination of multi-signature, address change, and forced login is indeed ruthless, but I guess off-chain manipulation can probably still bypass it.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 12-08 19:57
Honestly, these protective measures sound pretty intimidating, but anyone who really knows their stuff has probably already found a way around them.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 12-08 19:51
All these flashy anti-bot measures still can't stop those who are truly determined to exploit the system.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 12-08 19:48
Starting this routine again, to put it bluntly, it's just to guard against small-town market makers. The real big players have already gotten in.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 12-08 19:45
This set of defenses is indeed somewhat effective, but to be honest, it's still just a temporary fix rather than a fundamental solution.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 12-08 19:40
Ha, multi-signature plus login can indeed stop a lot of rookie scripts, but if players really want to find a way, there are still loopholes.
---
No matter how fancy the protection is, it still can't stop those who are smart.
---
To put it simply, it's just raising the cost. Low-end bots don't stand a chance, but those who really know what they're doing have already been working on solutions.
---
I've seen this address-changing operation several times, but it feels pretty much the same—no real difference.
---
Instead of going through all this trouble, why not think about how to make the project itself more attractive?
Recently, I took a look at a certain project's anti-bot measures, and they actually have quite a few tactics.
This time, they’re making significant moves: they’ve added multi-signature transaction verification at the API level, directly replaced the presale contract with a new address wtfdJKwQG9A4ayuouBEip6Hoi1DcsAAHVxeHmG5HG7E and upgraded it, and now require users to log in to participate. This combination of measures can indeed block most scripts currently on the market.
However, that being said, these protections aren’t foolproof. If someone never intended to go purely on-chain from the start and instead mixed in off-chain operations, these measures are basically ineffective. Of course, in terms of cost and effectiveness, filtering out most low-end bots is enough to achieve their goal—after all, it’s impossible to achieve 100% defense.