It's honestly ironic when you think about it. Permissionless composability gets hyped as THE fundamental advantage of blockchain architecture — the whole point of being trustless and interoperable. Yet here we are, watching the two biggest consumer-facing chains struggle to implement a functional two-way bridge between them.
Like, wasn't this supposed to be the easy part? The technology exists. The standards are there. But apparently building infrastructure that actually works across major ecosystems is still too complicated for the industry leaders. Makes you wonder if all that talk about seamless interoperability was just marketing fluff.
Maybe the real challenge isn't the tech itself, but getting competing ecosystems to actually cooperate. Or maybe it's just harder than anyone wants to admit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiSherpa
· 12-08 11:22
What happened to being permissionless? In the end, it still relies on people negotiating—hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 12-08 00:53
Well said, that's the norm in the Web3 space: lots of hype, but when it comes to actually doing things, it falls flat.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 12-08 00:52
Ha, it's the same old rhetoric again, just self-consolation.
Cross-chain is all about interest games; the technology hasn't been an issue for a long time, so don't shift the blame to infrastructure.
How can these two guys brag so much? It's unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 12-08 00:39
To put it bluntly, this is the biggest joke of Web3... All the hype, and yet they can't even get a cross-chain bridge working.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-08 00:37
Listen, this is exactly why I stopped believing in that composability nonsense a long time ago.
---
What happened to permissionless? In the end, even two major public chains can't get a bridge working, it's ridiculous.
---
As expected, it's still a matter of vested interests. The technology has been there for a long time; they just don't really want to cooperate.
---
Haha, classic Web3 promises vs. reality—this round of marketing is really spot on.
---
To be blunt, there's way more competition than collaboration in today's ecosystem. Don't count on any real interoperability.
---
Could it be that they just don't want to solve this problem at all? The more isolated the competitors, the better for them, I guess.
---
Damn, it's that same old excuse of "the technology already exists"—everything exists, but you just can't use any of it.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 12-08 00:28
To put it bluntly, it's just self-deception. If you can't even handle cross-chain bridging, what's the point of boasting about permissionless composability?
It's honestly ironic when you think about it. Permissionless composability gets hyped as THE fundamental advantage of blockchain architecture — the whole point of being trustless and interoperable. Yet here we are, watching the two biggest consumer-facing chains struggle to implement a functional two-way bridge between them.
Like, wasn't this supposed to be the easy part? The technology exists. The standards are there. But apparently building infrastructure that actually works across major ecosystems is still too complicated for the industry leaders. Makes you wonder if all that talk about seamless interoperability was just marketing fluff.
Maybe the real challenge isn't the tech itself, but getting competing ecosystems to actually cooperate. Or maybe it's just harder than anyone wants to admit.