A lot of people are probably struggling with LLM inference costs, but lately, a technique called speculative sampling has been getting attention.



Here’s how it works: a smaller model predicts the results first, and then a larger target model verifies them all at once using GPU parallel processing. This can reduce the number of target model calls by more than five times, dramatically lowering inference costs.

Think of it as the draft model quickly creating a rough draft, while the main model efficiently verifies it. The key point is that you can save computing resources while maintaining the same output quality.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 21h ago
Use small models for drafting and large models for verification—can this really save costs by 5 times? That’s pretty impressive. Feels like this is the way LLMs can actually be used affordably.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFanvip
· 23h ago
If we do it this way, can the inference cost really be reduced by five times? That sounds a bit exaggerated... Are small models reliable?
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leakervip
· 12-07 16:33
Small models take the lead and large models handle the validation—this workflow is truly smart. Who wouldn't be tempted by a fivefold cost reduction?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 12-06 18:57
Oh, finally someone mentioned this. Speculative sampling really is a lifesaver... Small models handle the initial work and large models do the review; this combo really cuts down costs. Five times, man—if this can actually be implemented, those teams struggling under inference costs will be thrilled.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMakervip
· 12-06 09:58
Now the costs can be reduced; this kind of clever move should have been done earlier.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 12-06 09:55
Small models draft, large models verify the results—this division of labor is truly brilliant. With costs potentially slashed by 5 times, who can resist?
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShruggedvip
· 12-06 09:51
5x cost reduction? If this can really deliver consistently, those small teams struggling under the weight of inference costs might finally catch a break.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 12-06 09:49
Haha, it's that cost optimization thing again. This speculative sampling is indeed quite interesting... small models handle the initial stage while large models do the final review, feels just like an assembly line. A 5x cost reduction sounds a bit exaggerated, but if it really saves money, then that's fine.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 12-06 09:43
This idea is interesting. Let's dig into the details—a small model as the vanguard, large model for posterior, can costs really be cut by 5 times? How was the data validated? Hope it's not the old routine of paper data vs actual performance being different. The key point is whether the output quality is truly uncompromised; we need to see real-world stress test data before believing it.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)