India's administration is mulling over a contentious proposition: mandatory satellite-based location tracking on all smartphones, around the clock. The stated goal? Enhanced surveillance capabilities. But here's the kicker—tech heavyweights Apple, Google, and Samsung have collectively pushed back, raising red flags about user privacy erosion.
This isn't just a policy debate. It's a clash between state control and individual digital rights. In an era where blockchain advocates champion data sovereignty and self-custody, proposals like this feel like a step backward. Forced geolocation tracking crosses a line—turning personal devices into constant monitoring tools.
The tech giants' objection isn't surprising. Privacy frameworks, user trust, and regulatory compliance are at stake. Whether this proposal gains traction or gets shelved will signal how governments navigate the tension between security demands and civil liberties in the smartphone age.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RooftopVIP
· 10h ago
India's method is just too extreme—24-hour satellite tracking... Is this still my phone?
---
Apple, Google, and Samsung have joined forces to oppose it. For once, the big companies are finally doing the right thing.
---
To put it bluntly, they just want to turn phones into electronic ankle monitors like in prison. Terrifying.
---
Isn't Web3 all about escaping this kind of surveillance? And now we're back to this? Ridiculous.
---
Privacy rights can't just be violated at will. What is the Indian government thinking?
---
Even tech giants have their moments of principle, though it's rare.
---
National security vs. personal freedom, the eternal conflict... But using coercive measures is just too much.
---
Wait... so all my movements will be recorded? No privacy at all.
---
This is exactly where the significance of blockchain and self-custody comes in.
---
This is blatant digital authoritarianism. Horrifying.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 10h ago
NGL, this move by India is a bit outrageous... turning phones into surveillance devices? Isn’t this just Big Brother all over again? The blockchain crowd is going to go crazy.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 10h ago
India's move this time is truly outrageous—forcing satellite location tracking? They're basically turning phones into surveillance devices, completely killing off mobility. Apple, Google, and Samsung are joining forces to push back. The dynamics at play here are pretty interesting...
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBard
· 10h ago
ngl this is just the typical old trick... The government wants to monitor, big companies say no, but in the end, it's still ordinary people's privacy that gets sold out.
India's administration is mulling over a contentious proposition: mandatory satellite-based location tracking on all smartphones, around the clock. The stated goal? Enhanced surveillance capabilities. But here's the kicker—tech heavyweights Apple, Google, and Samsung have collectively pushed back, raising red flags about user privacy erosion.
This isn't just a policy debate. It's a clash between state control and individual digital rights. In an era where blockchain advocates champion data sovereignty and self-custody, proposals like this feel like a step backward. Forced geolocation tracking crosses a line—turning personal devices into constant monitoring tools.
The tech giants' objection isn't surprising. Privacy frameworks, user trust, and regulatory compliance are at stake. Whether this proposal gains traction or gets shelved will signal how governments navigate the tension between security demands and civil liberties in the smartphone age.