$ETH is in trouble again! This time, it’s not your usual contract vulnerability, but a premeditated "sting operation."
Last night, the DeFi community was rocked—USPD stablecoin protocol suffered a devastating attack. But what’s bizarre is that the hacker wasn’t acting on impulse; they’d planted the seeds back when the project was first deployed. After gaining admin privileges ahead of everyone else, they quietly launched a "twin version" and laid low for months. Then, in the early hours yesterday, they struck suddenly: minted 98 million USPD out of thin air and made off with 232 stETH—executed flawlessly from start to finish.
Why is this especially nasty?
First, there’s the collapse of trust. In the past, when people encountered attacks, at least you could comfort yourself with "the code audit wasn’t thorough." But this time, it’s different—the privileges were hijacked right from the start. It’s like before you even get your house keys made, the thief already has a spare. Labels like "audit passed" and "security certified" instantly become a joke.
Next, stablecoin narratives take a hit. Even though USPD isn’t that big, what the market fears most is a "domino effect." One protocol blows up, and the whole sector suffers—users start doubting: could the other stablecoins in my hands also be ticking time bombs?
The team did react quickly, contacting major exchanges to freeze the assets and even trying to negotiate with the hacker. But honestly, what’s done is done—the losses are set in stone.
A few heartfelt words for everyone:
Don’t be fooled by the sugar-coated promises of new projects. Protocols that shout "revolutionary innovation" right after launch are much riskier than you think. Whether the team is reliable and governance is transparent—these soft factors are even more critical than the code itself.
An audit report ≠ a get-out-of-jail-free card. Even the most reputable institutions can only check for known risks. When it comes to projects with "inborn" issues like this, not even the gods can help.
Always remember position management. For any DeFi play, only put in money you can afford to lose entirely without affecting your life. Going all in? That’s gambling your livelihood.
There’s no absolute safe zone in DeFi. The prerequisite for survival is to respect risk. Staying alive comes first, making money comes second.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 12-05 09:50
Here we go again, audits are useless, this time it's rotten from the inside out.
---
Damn, why do people keep rushing in nonstop, aren't they afraid of losing everything?
---
That's why I always say, no matter how tempting a new token looks, you gotta stay calm for at least three seconds.
---
stETH is the scapegoat again, stablecoins really are just a never-ending drama.
---
What's the use of a fast team response if the money's already gone, and they're still negotiating?
---
The hacker lurked for months before making a move, that's what you call professionals doing professional work.
---
It's always the same story, audit passes and everyone sleeps soundly, serves them right.
---
When permissions are locked down at the source, it basically means it's game over.
---
Trust me, no matter how good the project seems, ask yourself how you’d feel losing half before getting in.
---
Another stablecoin bites the dust, now users are scared other coins will be next.
---
DeFi is basically a mix of a casino and a ticking time bomb.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 12-05 09:48
That's why I never touch new coins. There's never an end to the bagholders getting rekt.
---
Audit reports are really just paper tigers. This time it's pretty much confirmed.
---
Damn, the permissions got compromised from the source? What's even the point of playing anymore?
---
Same old trick again. In a minute we'll hear a bunch of bullshit like "we're fixing it."
---
It doesn't matter if USPD is dead, the real problem is how anxious other stablecoin users must be right now.
---
Don't ask me why I keep all my money in my wallet—this is exactly why.
---
The team reacted quickly? No matter how quick they are, it can't be saved now. What's done is done, bro.
---
I don't touch any of those so-called revolutionary innovations, not a single one, seriously.
---
I just want to know how the hacker got in early on—was there an insider?
---
Position management is the real truth. I'm even more convinced now.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 12-05 09:48
Damn, this is the so-called "inside job"—they dug the trap from the very beginning and waited for everyone to fall in.
Honestly, anyone still daring to all in on new projects now is literally gambling with their life.
Even audit reports are useless now. Who would dare touch stablecoins anymore?
Yet another "revolutionary innovation" has fallen to greed, what a joke.
But seriously, why do people always have to chase the latest projects? It’s absurd.
The way the permissions got hijacked is honestly terrifying the more you think about it.
Alright, this incident should be a lesson to everyone—stop blindly trusting so-called security certifications.
USPD is probably done for after this, early users must be so frustrated.
At the end of the day, it’s a matter of human nature—no amount of audits can prevent insider threats.
I just want to ask: are people still soloing DeFi now true warriors or just plain idiots?
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 12-05 09:45
Damn, this audit report is just a front. I can't believe a word you say.
Were the permissions compromised from the very beginning? How is anyone supposed to play this game? Might as well give up now.
After the USPD crash, maybe I should check if the other stablecoins I hold have problems too. Kinda nervous now.
Another one of those "revolutionary" innovations, boasting right after launch. Now whenever I see that word, I just want to run.
Better to honestly keep funds in a cold wallet and not risk these traps that have been set up from the start.
Now the entire stablecoin sector has to take the blame, and retail investors are the ones getting hurt.
Front-running and permissions being controlled—this hurts more than technical bugs. Trust level instantly zero.
Don't ask why I'm still here—just watching for the drama and learning lessons.
DeFi really is a giant casino; making it out alive is already an achievement.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 12-05 09:31
Same old trick, just got exposed this time. So many projects have done this before—who still dares to touch new coins?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 12-05 09:26
I'm honestly speechless. This is DeFi—no matter how impressive the audit report is, it can't stop insider threats.
Confidence in stablecoins has taken a huge hit; who would dare touch new tokens in the short term...
Yet another painful lesson. The old saying still holds true: never go heavy on projects you don't understand.
These hackers are truly outrageous—planting traps from the start and just running off with the money.
History keeps repeating itself. Will the next USDC also have hidden pitfalls?
What's the point of a quick team response? The money's already gone. Just accept the loss.
In my opinion, risk management needs to be treated as seriously as eating.
$ETH is in trouble again! This time, it’s not your usual contract vulnerability, but a premeditated "sting operation."
Last night, the DeFi community was rocked—USPD stablecoin protocol suffered a devastating attack. But what’s bizarre is that the hacker wasn’t acting on impulse; they’d planted the seeds back when the project was first deployed. After gaining admin privileges ahead of everyone else, they quietly launched a "twin version" and laid low for months. Then, in the early hours yesterday, they struck suddenly: minted 98 million USPD out of thin air and made off with 232 stETH—executed flawlessly from start to finish.
Why is this especially nasty?
First, there’s the collapse of trust. In the past, when people encountered attacks, at least you could comfort yourself with "the code audit wasn’t thorough." But this time, it’s different—the privileges were hijacked right from the start. It’s like before you even get your house keys made, the thief already has a spare. Labels like "audit passed" and "security certified" instantly become a joke.
Next, stablecoin narratives take a hit. Even though USPD isn’t that big, what the market fears most is a "domino effect." One protocol blows up, and the whole sector suffers—users start doubting: could the other stablecoins in my hands also be ticking time bombs?
The team did react quickly, contacting major exchanges to freeze the assets and even trying to negotiate with the hacker. But honestly, what’s done is done—the losses are set in stone.
A few heartfelt words for everyone:
Don’t be fooled by the sugar-coated promises of new projects. Protocols that shout "revolutionary innovation" right after launch are much riskier than you think. Whether the team is reliable and governance is transparent—these soft factors are even more critical than the code itself.
An audit report ≠ a get-out-of-jail-free card. Even the most reputable institutions can only check for known risks. When it comes to projects with "inborn" issues like this, not even the gods can help.
Always remember position management. For any DeFi play, only put in money you can afford to lose entirely without affecting your life. Going all in? That’s gambling your livelihood.
There’s no absolute safe zone in DeFi. The prerequisite for survival is to respect risk. Staying alive comes first, making money comes second.