While the whole world is hyping up the AI concept, some people have given a much more down-to-earth answer—forget about things that might happen a thousand years from now, let’s first focus on getting done what can actually be implemented in the next three to five years.
This approach sounds simple, but the underlying logic is quite clear: sociologists love talking about the distant future, scientists like painting ten-year visions, but real tech practitioners are focused on “how large models and powerful computing can solve practical problems in various industries.”
How does this work in practice? A few examples make it clear.
At the port, Tianjin Port has already achieved full automation—from container loading and unloading, stacking, to customs clearance, AI connects the entire process. Underground in the mines, things get even more impressive: data modeling is used to directly predict the risk of gas explosions, so miners no longer even need to go underground. Hospitals are also changing; Ruijin Hospital has developed a pathological large model that helps doctors improve diagnostic accuracy, which means the experience of top doctors can be replicated in more places.
The most interesting case is in the steel plant—blast furnace ironmaking, a traditional industry, is being optimized by AI large models that dynamically simulate and adjust control parameters. Even a mere 1% increase in efficiency translates into astronomical value.
Simply put, this approach doesn’t seek disruptive innovation, but rather focuses on relentless small improvements in every step. It might not sound sexy, but it’s probably more reliable. At the end of the day, technology should serve people—freeing coal miners from dangerous environments and enabling doctors to make more accurate diagnoses. That’s what AI should really be doing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Anon4461
· 16h ago
The unmanned area at Tianjin Port is indeed impressive, but what I care more about is the mining sector—it directly saves lives, and that's what technology should be doing.
Compared to this pragmatic approach, those who brag about AGI every day do seem a bit unrealistic.
A 1% increase in efficiency converted into money is really a staggering figure; the steel plant case really hit home.
Instead of talking about disruptive innovation, it's better to honestly solve real-world problems. I support this mindset.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 12-05 08:50
Oh my god, someone finally said it. Those people who keep hyping up the future have the same mentality I had when I went all in on some altcoin back in the day—just thinking about 1,000x returns, never considering where the liquidation price is. Cases like Tianjin Port, mines, and hospitals—those are the real risk control points, each one is concrete and practical. Compared to those who just make empty promises, I trust that 1% efficiency improvement in a steel plant more—this kind of thing can’t get liquidated, it’s actually stable.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 12-05 08:49
Really, stop always thinking about flying to space—the cases at Tianjin Port and in the mines are the real deal.
This is the kind of work AI should be doing, no pretentiousness.
A 1% increase in efficiency translates into outrageous profits; that's how traditional industries get disrupted.
Honestly, this is way more reliable than hyping up concepts. Who still believes those ten-year pipe dreams?
Miners no longer need to go underground? That's what you call technology saving lives.
Feels a lot more valuable than those empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 12-05 08:49
To be honest, compared to those hyping up the future, I prefer this kind of thinking. Unmanned operations at Tianjin Port, mine warning systems—these are real, tangible outputs, not just vaporware concepts.
A 1% improvement in efficiency, when translated into money, is truly astronomical. This is what AI should actually be doing.
Some people are still making empty promises, while others are already taking action. That’s where the gap comes from.
I’m particularly interested in improving the accuracy of medical diagnoses. Digitalization of healthcare should be the biggest blue ocean market.
I’m tired of hearing about AI wiping out humanity. Real, tangible cost reduction and efficiency improvement are much more appealing.
This approach is really down-to-earth, no hype, all practical applications.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 12-05 08:48
The one at Tianjin Port is truly amazing. The unmanned port has already been implemented, yet some people keep hyping up AGI as a savior. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 12-05 08:38
I've been optimistic about the unmanned operations at Tianjin Port for a long time. It's much more practical than all the AGI hype—the real money is here.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 12-05 08:25
To be honest, compared to those who keep hyping up AGI destroying humanity, I trust these boring-as-hell solutions more... Things like port automation and mine warning systems are the ones actually making money.
While the whole world is hyping up the AI concept, some people have given a much more down-to-earth answer—forget about things that might happen a thousand years from now, let’s first focus on getting done what can actually be implemented in the next three to five years.
This approach sounds simple, but the underlying logic is quite clear: sociologists love talking about the distant future, scientists like painting ten-year visions, but real tech practitioners are focused on “how large models and powerful computing can solve practical problems in various industries.”
How does this work in practice? A few examples make it clear.
At the port, Tianjin Port has already achieved full automation—from container loading and unloading, stacking, to customs clearance, AI connects the entire process. Underground in the mines, things get even more impressive: data modeling is used to directly predict the risk of gas explosions, so miners no longer even need to go underground. Hospitals are also changing; Ruijin Hospital has developed a pathological large model that helps doctors improve diagnostic accuracy, which means the experience of top doctors can be replicated in more places.
The most interesting case is in the steel plant—blast furnace ironmaking, a traditional industry, is being optimized by AI large models that dynamically simulate and adjust control parameters. Even a mere 1% increase in efficiency translates into astronomical value.
Simply put, this approach doesn’t seek disruptive innovation, but rather focuses on relentless small improvements in every step. It might not sound sexy, but it’s probably more reliable. At the end of the day, technology should serve people—freeing coal miners from dangerous environments and enabling doctors to make more accurate diagnoses. That’s what AI should really be doing.