2025-12-04 23:36:48

The start was okay, but the ending was disappointing.

By the time I woke up this morning, the project had already closed. Now they expect me to buy in at this valuation? No way, it's not worth it at all.

What's even more ridiculous is that a certain decentralized social protocol didn't even bother with a whitelist. I honestly doubt many people even know about this.

Probably just the founder working on it alone again.

Iteration is definitely a good thing, but if the first launch could have made a splash and surprised users, wouldn’t the road ahead be much smoother? With this kind of start, it's a bit of a shame.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PuzzledScholar

· 1h ago

Same old story—those who got in early have already cashed out, and now the latecomers are waking up to their fate as bag holders. --- No whitelist? This protocol is probably still lurking on some dark web forum. --- If the first launch was actually successful, you wouldn’t even be here complaining—it would’ve been drained clean already. --- What’s wrong with the founder quietly building? The problem is, nobody even knows about it, haha. --- Seriously, you expect people to buy in at this valuation? Aren’t you just digging your own hole here? --- Honestly, I’m so done with being the exit liquidity. Every time, it’s game over before the first launch even happens. --- Iteration is a good thing? Please, just stop iterating—if it can just be stable, that’s good enough. --- Honestly, this launch is a mess, but I bet some people are still quietly buying the dip. --- Decentralized social protocol? Oh, I know—that thing nobody on the street has ever heard of. --- “Wake up in the morning and it’s already over”—I swear I’ve heard that line a hundred times.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 12-05 00:06

This project, really—such a common beginner’s mistake: working in silence and nobody knows about it. --- No whitelist? That’s definitely a wild move, really makes me question their operational capability. --- Started off decently and then ruined it themselves, pretty ridiculous. --- If you don’t make a big splash at launch, no matter how much you iterate later, it’s hopeless. --- Now you expect people to take over at this valuation? Forget it, I’m out. --- There are so many decentralized social protocols, and without any innovation, why should anyone choose you? --- What a pity—if they had taken the right first step, things could have been different. --- This is what happens when someone works on a project alone; the team is too important. --- It was shut down ages ago and I didn’t even know; what kind of marketing was that? --- Iteration is good, but if the foundation is rotten, you can’t fix it.

View OriginalReply0

ShortingEnthusiast

· 12-05 00:05

Woke up to yet another rug-pulled project, this valuation is really absurd. No whitelist at all? Is this for real? Feels like something shady is going on behind the scenes. If this is how the first step is, how can the rest be any good? Probably just another self-indulgent idea, but where are the users? Instead of calling it iteration, it’s more like patching things up. Should have seen through this a long time ago. Really took a big loss this time. Never thought it could be this bad. This move is pretty outrageous, man. Is it really that hard to make a strong first impression? You expect to attract people with this? With such a high entry barrier, who would dare get involved? Feels like the people doing this don't even care.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 12-04 23:59

Woke up in the morning and it was all gone, who can handle that? No whitelist? Isn't this just suicide marketing? The founder is working alone and still wants to change the world, what a joke. The first step already failed, and you still expect things to go well? Pure fantasy. This valuation, I really don't understand who would pay for it. Yet another self-hyped project, I'm really speechless.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 12-04 23:48

On-chain data shows that this wave of deployment started to decline as early as 2 a.m. From my observation, the whitelist mechanism was not properly set up at all. Interestingly, contract change records indicate that even the founders may not have reserved enough liquidity. Based on past experience, this is often a prelude to potential pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
274.78K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
71.47K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
10.14K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
10.97K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
11.77K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
MLGDMilo Gold
MC:$3.53KHolders:1
0.00%
2
GBANKGate Bank
MC:$3.96KHolders:3
2.01%
3
GXNGurufin
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.00%
4
GOLDGOLD
MC:$3.5KHolders:1
0.00%
5
GECKOGecko
MC:$3.59KHolders:2
0.00%

Sitemap