Some new academic work just tweaked their numbers on how badly climate shifts might dent worldwide earnings. The revised estimate still paints a grim picture, but the researchers dialed back their projections a bit after refining their models.



This matters more than you'd think for long-term portfolio planning. When major economic headwinds like climate disruption get quantified, it affects everything from commodity pricing to infrastructure investments. Smart money watches these macro trends closely—not just for ESG virtue signaling, but because environmental risks translate into real balance sheet impacts.

Anyone positioning for the next decade needs to factor in these systemic pressures. Whether you're hedging with hard assets or exploring climate-focused tokenized solutions, understanding the economic downside helps frame realistic expectations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractBugHuntervip
· 12-07 05:30
The numbers have shrunk and it's still just as bad; I should have calculated it this way earlier.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 12-06 17:47
Digital adjustments can't change the overall trend; climate risk is right there. --- Once again, it's academia tweaking the data, but the essence is still pessimistic... real money has already started positioning. --- Using tokenized solutions to hedge against climate risk? Sounds good, but it still feels too idealistic to me. --- Portfolio planning that doesn't consider climate factors is just unprofessional now, that's for real. --- No matter how accurate the model is, it can't change reality—the key is who gets in early on hard assets. --- I'm tired of hearing the ESG narrative; in the end, it's really just about where the money is flowing.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippavip
· 12-04 06:08
NGL, these scholars are just fine-tuning data for their own amusement. Climate risk has already been priced in, hasn't it?
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 12-04 06:08
Changed the data again. This time it's not as pessimistic, but it's still pretty damn frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWangvip
· 12-04 05:57
Changed the data again? Is it adjusted down or up this time? Anyway, I can never keep up with these scholars' minds...
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalistvip
· 12-04 05:40
The numbers look good, but the real risks are still underestimated, aren't they?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)