Connecticut just dropped the hammer on some big names in the trading world. The state's Department of Consumer Protection fired off cease and desist letters to Kalshi, Robinhood, and another platform, claiming they're running illegal online gambling operations.

According to Connecticut authorities, these platforms are violating state law by offering what regulators classify as gambling activities. This marks another chapter in the ongoing tension between innovative trading products and traditional gambling regulations.

The move highlights how different states are taking varying approaches to prediction markets and newer trading features. What one jurisdiction sees as legitimate financial instruments, another views as gambling that crosses legal boundaries.

This regulatory crackdown could signal tougher scrutiny ahead for platforms offering prediction markets or similar products in states with strict gambling laws.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnruggableChad

· 12-03 20:14

The regulators are acting up again. How did prediction markets suddenly become gambling? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 12-03 20:14

Here we go again, this time it's Connecticut's turn. Seriously, every state wants to have a say 🤦 Robinhood is under scrutiny again? This platform is really resilient. There's just a thin line between prediction markets and gambling—a single law separates them. The rules can change at any time, it's impossible to keep up. If Connecticut really takes action, will other states follow suit? If there's a total ban, these platforms won't survive. I've seen too many regulatory moves—one day it's illegal, the next day it's allowed. It all depends on whose legal team is stronger.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 12-03 20:10

On-chain data shows that this round of enforcement actions had been lying in wait within the contracts for a while. Connecticut’s logic is basically "any transaction we can’t understand is gambling." Based on past experience, these kinds of local bans rarely actually stop anything. It’s worth noting that Kalshi and Robinhood are probably urgently reviewing their deployment details right now, and from the code, it looks like they’ll be forced to restructure. As expected, each state is doing its own thing—this is the real situation of so-called "legal financial innovation" in the US. What’s interesting is that they even issued cease and desist orders, which suggests even tougher measures may be coming. My observation is that these regulatory agencies are essentially just paving the way for traditional financial groups.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 12-03 20:04

Again? The regulators are getting harsher and harsher with their tactics.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 12-03 19:50

Here we go again, that's typical of US regulation—it's legal today and illegal tomorrow.

View OriginalReply0