Recently, there are too many voices in the market, making it difficult for people to grasp the key points.
Everyone is glued to the K-line every day, chasing hot topics and discussing narratives, but the things that can truly change the landscape are often hidden in corners that no one pays attention to.
I recently studied the Lorenzo Protocol project from start to finish and suddenly realized something: what BTC lacks the most right now is not the next price increase story, but a truly usable "parallel system."
How to understand?
You can think of the BTC main chain as a super secure highway, but there is only one lane, and the speed limit is particularly low. Everyone wants to get on this road, and the result is a terrible traffic jam, with fees that are outrageously high.
So those cool applications and large amounts of funds can only take another route on different chains, and BTC is left hanging on the side.
This is not to say that BTC is not safe—on the contrary, it is too safe, so safe that it cannot be flexible.
The problem is: BTC has the strongest consensus and the deepest liquidity, yet it cannot be involved in more scenarios. It's like having a mountain of gold, but you can only look at it and not use it.
What the BTC ecosystem truly needs is a "backup runway" that can operate in parallel with the main chain—without changing the nature of BTC itself, but allowing its value to flow and play a role in a broader context.
This is my biggest impression while researching Lorenzo: it is not trying to replace anything, but rather attempting to build a set of infrastructure that makes BTC "move."
It's not about showing off skills; it's about genuinely solving problems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDetector
· 4h ago
ngl, everyone's out here reading tea leaves on some layer2 narrative when the real play is infrastructure nobody's even *looking* at yet. been there since mt gox, pattern recognition tells me lorenzo's actually onto something... or maybe i'm just pattern-matching again lmao
Reply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 8h ago
That's right, it's all noise now, and anything truly valuable is being drowned out.
Lorenzo's idea is actually quite interesting to me—the concept of a parallel system really hits the mark. BTC is like a vault: it's secure, but you really can't use it. The transaction fees are so expensive, who can handle that?
But I still think we need to wait and see how things develop. It's way too easy to get hyped up by a story these days.
The runway looks good, but who knows if it can really unlock BTC's liquidity.
Projects like this, especially infrastructure, just need time to prove themselves. No need to go all-in just yet.
The key is whether there are real applications landing. There are too many projects just telling stories—I’m already numb to it.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 12-03 00:52
Ah, I also looked at this Lorenzo, and it really has some substance.
Really, instead of promoting the next 100x coin every day, it's better to think about how BTC can thrive.
There's a mountain of gold that can't be used, this analogy is perfect...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 12-03 00:51
To be honest, it is quite rare to see someone seriously thinking about these things instead of just shouting "rise rise rise".
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboy
· 12-03 00:47
You're right, Lorenzo's idea is indeed different.
But I still want to see how it works in practice.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalyst
· 12-03 00:34
Wow, here comes another wave of "I discovered the truth" rhetoric [sigh], but to be honest, Lorenzo's logic does have some substance, much more reliable than those project parties that pump every day. The question is, can this "backup runway" concept really gain traction? Or is it just another new game of playing people for suckers? I'll wait a few more months to see the Candlestick charts before making a judgment.
Everyone entering a position now needs to be cautious, as the technical aspect hasn't broken through the resistance level yet.
Still, the same saying, risk control is always the top priority.
Recently, there are too many voices in the market, making it difficult for people to grasp the key points.
Everyone is glued to the K-line every day, chasing hot topics and discussing narratives, but the things that can truly change the landscape are often hidden in corners that no one pays attention to.
I recently studied the Lorenzo Protocol project from start to finish and suddenly realized something: what BTC lacks the most right now is not the next price increase story, but a truly usable "parallel system."
How to understand?
You can think of the BTC main chain as a super secure highway, but there is only one lane, and the speed limit is particularly low. Everyone wants to get on this road, and the result is a terrible traffic jam, with fees that are outrageously high.
So those cool applications and large amounts of funds can only take another route on different chains, and BTC is left hanging on the side.
This is not to say that BTC is not safe—on the contrary, it is too safe, so safe that it cannot be flexible.
The problem is: BTC has the strongest consensus and the deepest liquidity, yet it cannot be involved in more scenarios. It's like having a mountain of gold, but you can only look at it and not use it.
What the BTC ecosystem truly needs is a "backup runway" that can operate in parallel with the main chain—without changing the nature of BTC itself, but allowing its value to flow and play a role in a broader context.
This is my biggest impression while researching Lorenzo: it is not trying to replace anything, but rather attempting to build a set of infrastructure that makes BTC "move."
It's not about showing off skills; it's about genuinely solving problems.