Recently, a project called CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) has emerged in the circle. Does it look familiar? That’s right, it’s those old faces who have changed their names again after playing people for suckers with AKAS, OLY, and LynkCoDAO.
I specifically checked the on-chain records, wallet addresses, transfer paths, and trading methods—all matched up. These guys are playing the "park scheme" game: changing names, packaging it as some new concept of "open source transparency," and then continuing to play people for suckers.
Their script is basically unchanged: in the early stage, they create some hype with airdrops, pull in a few KOLs to endorse it, and once the retail investors come in, they start dumping and run away. Those who were played for suckers in the last round are probably still in the group asking "when will it rebound," while this group has already moved on to the next project.
Just a reminder: when you see projects like this, just blacklist them and that's it. Don't hold on to the illusion that you can run fast. What scammers fear the most is having no one to take over; let's not be that person.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DataOnlooker
· 12-02 19:16
This brother is really ruthless with this skinning; comparing the on-chain records directly exposes the truth. After so many rounds of playing the same tricks with no change in the essence, there are still people willing to catch the falling knife. I am truly drunk.
---
v3 PRO? I see it as v3 fraud, the same old routine: airdrop to create momentum → KOL endorsement → dumping and rug pull, the script is worn out.
---
Agreed, for such projects, blacklist one as you see one, don’t expect to escape from the cut loss; that’s just survivor bias.
---
Oh come on, are these people back again? Last time they cut KAS, I haven’t even recovered, and now they’re back in disguise; their audacity is really big.
---
The wallet address and transfer paths all match up; this is no coincidence, it's a blatant harvesting machine.
---
What I fear most is that someone still holds the fantasy of "I can definitely run fast this round," and then becomes the last dumb buyer.
---
When I see such projects, my first reaction is to blacklist the relevant KOLs as well, to avoid being fooled again.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-02 19:09
wallet clustering's screaming red flags here tbh... transaction velocity on those addresses don't lie
Reply0
StableBoi
· 12-02 18:55
They have changed their vests again. These people really know how to bounce around. I honestly don't want to see it for the fourth time.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 12-02 18:47
What the heck, another wave is coming? These people are really itching for trouble, changing their vests more frequently than they change their faces.
Oh my, the on-chain records match up, isn't this just a blatant repeat of playing people for suckers? The people in front are still shouting rebound in the group, while these guys have long gone to the new project, a typical "one-stop service."
Directly blocking them doesn't vent my anger; I just want to know where the conscience of these KOLs has gone? Supporting such garbage projects, aren't they afraid of ruining their own reputation?
The days of the dumb buyers are really over, they need to wake up.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 12-02 18:47
The on-chain data indeed matches, and this set of "vested reincarnation" tactics has already become a template. From wallet tracking to manipulation paths, the logic is tightly woven to the point of being terrifying.
However, the real question is—why is there always someone to catch a falling knife? This needs to be reflected upon.
Recently, a project called CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) has emerged in the circle. Does it look familiar? That’s right, it’s those old faces who have changed their names again after playing people for suckers with AKAS, OLY, and LynkCoDAO.
I specifically checked the on-chain records, wallet addresses, transfer paths, and trading methods—all matched up. These guys are playing the "park scheme" game: changing names, packaging it as some new concept of "open source transparency," and then continuing to play people for suckers.
Their script is basically unchanged: in the early stage, they create some hype with airdrops, pull in a few KOLs to endorse it, and once the retail investors come in, they start dumping and run away. Those who were played for suckers in the last round are probably still in the group asking "when will it rebound," while this group has already moved on to the next project.
Just a reminder: when you see projects like this, just blacklist them and that's it. Don't hold on to the illusion that you can run fast. What scammers fear the most is having no one to take over; let's not be that person.