Here's what's really broken about Humidifi's token model: zero credible governance framework.
When you bundle foundation reserves and ecosystem funds together without clear oversight mechanisms, the market reads it one way—team dump risk. The trust deficit isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet. It's about the absence of enforceable safeguards preventing insiders from raiding those allocations.
No multisig transparency? No vesting schedules with third-party verification? Then those "community funds" might as well be labeled pre-sale inventory.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NoodlesOrTokens
· 12-05 04:03
Same old trick—they mix the foundation and ecosystem funds together just to shirk responsibility.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 12-03 23:06
This is yet another project without even a multisig—how can they claim to be decentralized?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 12-02 14:57
ngl humidifi this trap is a typical case of self-deception... talking about community funds, without multisig, without third-party verification, isn't it just leaving a backdoor for oneself?
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 12-02 14:55
It's the same old trap again, the foundation reserve is using the banner of community to raise funds, and they still dare to call it Decentralization without even having multisig.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 12-02 14:38
ngl humidifi this trap tokenomics is just a skin change, the community funds part is really shady.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 12-02 14:35
I see through this trick of humidifi, claiming community fund without multi-signature or lock-up position, it's hilarious.
Here's what's really broken about Humidifi's token model: zero credible governance framework.
When you bundle foundation reserves and ecosystem funds together without clear oversight mechanisms, the market reads it one way—team dump risk. The trust deficit isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet. It's about the absence of enforceable safeguards preventing insiders from raiding those allocations.
No multisig transparency? No vesting schedules with third-party verification? Then those "community funds" might as well be labeled pre-sale inventory.