Why would centralized tech giants prioritize user safety when it directly conflicts with their profit models? They won't—not voluntarily. The reality is stark: meaningful safety protocols eat into revenue streams. That's exactly why we need legislative frameworks that force accountability. Without regulatory pressure, these platforms will keep choosing profit over protection. The question isn't whether they can build safer systems—it's whether they're willing to sacrifice margins to do it. Spoiler: history says no.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasSavingMaster
· 14h ago
Oh, come on. I've never seen these big companies do good deeds on their own initiative—they only act when they're forced to.
View OriginalReply0
token_therapist
· 12-01 16:45
I said long ago that these big companies would not take action on their own; they have to be forced to do so by the law.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 12-01 16:23
Yes, that's the reality. No matter how you call on them, they won't take the initiative to change unless they are forced.
Why would centralized tech giants prioritize user safety when it directly conflicts with their profit models? They won't—not voluntarily. The reality is stark: meaningful safety protocols eat into revenue streams. That's exactly why we need legislative frameworks that force accountability. Without regulatory pressure, these platforms will keep choosing profit over protection. The question isn't whether they can build safer systems—it's whether they're willing to sacrifice margins to do it. Spoiler: history says no.