Recent media coverage criticizing a high-profile appointment to oversee AI and crypto policy completely misses the point. Here's the reality: if you want someone capable of regulating fast-moving technologies like artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, they need hands-on experience. That means investments across multiple companies in these sectors. How else would they understand the nuances, risks, and innovation happening in real-time? You can't regulate what you don't comprehend. The expectation that a qualified candidate would have zero financial exposure to these industries is absurd. It's like asking a chef to run a kitchen they've never cooked in.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rugged_again
· 12-03 04:40
What you said makes perfect sense. How can you regulate an industry well if you don't understand it? There's nothing wrong with this logic.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-01 07:54
nah the media completely missed the signal here. you can't regulate what you don't understand—it's literally impossible. watching whale clusters move capital, you see the patterns... regulators without skin in the game? they're just reading price tickers like tea leaves, tbh. the behavioral indicators tell you everything... anyone actually tracking address profiling knows this dude gets it.
Reply0
just_another_fish
· 12-01 07:51
To put it bluntly, this trap of logic is fundamentally untenable... Conflict of interest is just a conflict of interest, don’t dress it up as "practical experience".
Recent media coverage criticizing a high-profile appointment to oversee AI and crypto policy completely misses the point. Here's the reality: if you want someone capable of regulating fast-moving technologies like artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, they need hands-on experience. That means investments across multiple companies in these sectors. How else would they understand the nuances, risks, and innovation happening in real-time? You can't regulate what you don't comprehend. The expectation that a qualified candidate would have zero financial exposure to these industries is absurd. It's like asking a chef to run a kitchen they've never cooked in.