Woken up by the news at three in the morning, Lao Wang sent a photo – the mining farm that used to roar 24 hours a day is now empty, with only the four big characters "Store the Future" still glowing on the wall. "This time, we really can't go on anymore." This is the first time he has said such a thing in his three years in the industry.
In the past month, the FIL network has directly run 537 miners. However, I noticed a strange thing: nearly 40% of the people who withdrew are secretly exploring a new direction called GAIB. Why are those who understand machines the best suddenly turning to play with something completely different?
Old Wang presented me with a bunch of numbers: now every T of computing power can mine 0.0012 FIL per day, and his 512T machine, when fully utilized, has a daily income of 0.6 coins, which is only about 1.2 dollars. But what about the electricity cost? It burns 4.8 dollars a day. He joked that selling electricity directly is more profitable than mining.
However, what is truly disheartening is not just the paper losses. I later spoke with 17 miners who had exited, and found that what everyone feared was not the drop in coin prices: 72% felt that there was something off about storage demand, 85% believed that the entire economic model was flawed, and almost everyone said they would never touch projects that are solely supported by incentives again.
Interestingly, these people did not leave the circle after quitting the mining.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CoconutWaterBoy
· 10h ago
Selling electricity is more cost-effective than mining; how did it come to this...
I've long noticed that there's a lot of fluff in storage demand; the economic model of FIL has always been a failure...
Are we switching to GAIB again? Forget it, same old story...
Wait, 40% of people are eyeing GAIB? There's something going on here...
Three years of perseverance just went down the drain; it's painful to watch...
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 10h ago
Selling electricity is more cost-effective than mining, what has it come to... This matter with FIL really needs reflection.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 10h ago
Selling electricity is more cost-effective than mining, I'm dying of laughter, this data can't be fabricated.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 10h ago
Selling electricity makes money, and why even mine a hammer, haha
Understanding this death spiral of FIL, the incentives get dumped and no one catches a falling knife
Forty percent of people are flocking to GAIB... hey, another new sucker harvesting machine?
When the economic model collapses, it just collapses, no amount of hype can change that
This time it's not a coin price issue, it's that the project itself has problems
Three years of hard work goes back to square one overnight, that's something
Woken up by the news at three in the morning, Lao Wang sent a photo – the mining farm that used to roar 24 hours a day is now empty, with only the four big characters "Store the Future" still glowing on the wall. "This time, we really can't go on anymore." This is the first time he has said such a thing in his three years in the industry.
In the past month, the FIL network has directly run 537 miners. However, I noticed a strange thing: nearly 40% of the people who withdrew are secretly exploring a new direction called GAIB. Why are those who understand machines the best suddenly turning to play with something completely different?
Old Wang presented me with a bunch of numbers: now every T of computing power can mine 0.0012 FIL per day, and his 512T machine, when fully utilized, has a daily income of 0.6 coins, which is only about 1.2 dollars. But what about the electricity cost? It burns 4.8 dollars a day. He joked that selling electricity directly is more profitable than mining.
However, what is truly disheartening is not just the paper losses. I later spoke with 17 miners who had exited, and found that what everyone feared was not the drop in coin prices: 72% felt that there was something off about storage demand, 85% believed that the entire economic model was flawed, and almost everyone said they would never touch projects that are solely supported by incentives again.
Interestingly, these people did not leave the circle after quitting the mining.