Regarding the TUSD situation, I must clarify things with everyone today. In April, this stablecoin encountered a major problem - the liquidity gap approached 500 million USD. At that time, the situation was urgent, and I directly used my personal funds to fill this hole, all to ensure that all coin holders would not suffer losses.

The truth is gradually coming to light: the root of this crisis does not lie in the operational level, but rather in ARIA and FDT. As someone who has long adhered to the concept of decentralization, I have always believed that transparency and the safety of user assets are the bottom line in the blockchain world. This incident once again proves how important risk control and the transparency of fund custody are in the stablecoin field.

The future of blockchain must be built on a foundation of trust. Although the recent TUSD incident has sounded the alarm for the industry, it has also shown us what responsible project teams should do in times of crisis – prioritize user protection before seeking accountability.

ARIA-1.82%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlwaysMissingTops

· 3h ago

Is it again ARIA and FDT being blamed? Why is it always someone else's problem?

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 11-30 07:51

500 million holes filled by oneself? This move is indeed ruthless.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 11-30 07:50

I've been meaning to ask, is it true that 500 million dollars is being self-funded? --- By the way, how is AR handling that? Is there any follow-up or is it doomed again? --- After talking about Decentralization for so many years, in the end, we still have to rely on someone to come out and save the day, which is quite ironic. --- The collapse of trust in stablecoins is scarier than a black swan event. Is this a lesson learned? --- Transparency? Ha, I just want to see how that 500 million later recovers losses. --- The ancient practice of crisis intervention is still in play; whoever acts fast is the hero. This is reality. --- It feels like it's always like this—first pouring money to plug the holes, then investigating who did it. Isn't the order reversed? --- The operations with FDT were really something; I'm just waiting to see how they handle the follow-up.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist