The vendor lock-in issue is real. Once you're deep into AWS Lambda or similar platforms, migrating out becomes a nightmare. Your entire codebase gets tangled with proprietary APIs and services.
In Web3, we talk about decentralization constantly, yet many projects still rely on centralized cloud infrastructure. Kind of ironic when you think about it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 11-13 10:31
Cloud locking is a trap.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 11-13 00:39
Decentralization is the future. It's scary when manufacturers hold us hostage.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 11-10 17:10
It's really a difficult dependency trap.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 11-10 17:08
per my calculations, this reflects an 87.3% centralization vulnerability metric
Reply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 11-10 16:47
Pretending to be decentralized is really playing around.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 11-10 16:45
There really isn't much true decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 11-10 16:42
Yeah, everyone who's played around understands AWS's tricks.
Not a fan of serverless architecture, honestly.
The vendor lock-in issue is real. Once you're deep into AWS Lambda or similar platforms, migrating out becomes a nightmare. Your entire codebase gets tangled with proprietary APIs and services.
In Web3, we talk about decentralization constantly, yet many projects still rely on centralized cloud infrastructure. Kind of ironic when you think about it.