Altcoin ETFs Explode, Covering Bitcoin’s Ten-Year Path in Six Months: A Structural Shift Is Underway in Crypto

It took almost a decade for the Bitcoin ETF to win approval, while altcoins achieved the same in just six months.

In November 2025, Wall Street witnessed something extraordinary. Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin—altcoins once dismissed as “speculative toys” by mainstream finance—collectively launched as regulated ETF products on the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ within just a few weeks.

Even more remarkably, these ETFs didn’t go through the SEC’s traditional, rigorous, case-by-case review. Instead, they leveraged a new “universal listing standard” and an obscure “8(a) clause” fast track, becoming effective almost automatically with little more than tacit regulatory consent.

The rules of the game are being completely rewritten.

Strategic Regulatory Retreat

For years, the SEC’s approach to crypto ETFs could be summed up in one phrase: delay whenever possible.

Every new crypto ETF required exchanges to file rule change proposals, granting the SEC up to 240 days for review. The agency routinely rejected applications at the last minute, citing “market manipulation risk.” This enforcement-heavy approach led to countless applications vanishing without a trace.

But on September 17, 2025, everything changed.

The SEC approved amendments to the “universal listing standard” proposed by three major exchanges. This seemingly technical change opened the door for altcoin ETFs: crypto assets meeting certain conditions could now list directly without individual review.

The core eligibility requirements are straightforward:

• Either the asset must have at least six months of trading history on a CFTC-regulated futures market, with the exchange holding a surveillance agreement with that market;
• Or, there must already be an ETF on the market with at least 40% exposure to the asset.

Meeting either condition allows an altcoin ETF to use the “fast track.” Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin all qualified.

Issuers went further by leveraging another “accelerator”—the 8(a) clause.

Traditional ETF applications include a “delayed effectiveness” clause, letting the SEC review indefinitely. But in Q4 2025, issuers like Bitwise and Franklin Templeton began omitting this clause from their filings.

According to Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, if a registration statement lacks language delaying effectiveness, it automatically becomes effective 20 days after filing unless the SEC actively issues a stop order.

This forced the SEC into a binary choice: either find sufficient grounds to halt the product within 20 days or watch it go live automatically.

With staff shortages from a government shutdown and mounting judicial pressure from cases like Ripple and Grayscale, the SEC was overwhelmed by hundreds of pending applications. Compounding the issue, SEC Chair Gary Gensler resigned on January 20, 2025, leaving the agency in a “lame duck” state.

Issuers seized this rare window of opportunity and moved quickly.

Solana ETF: A Bold Staking Yield Experiment

Solana, celebrated for its high-performance blockchain, became the third “blue chip” asset to be ETF-listed after BTC and ETH.

By November 2025, six Solana ETFs had launched, including Bitwise’s BSOL, Grayscale’s GSOL, and VanEck’s VSOL. Bitwise’s BSOL was especially aggressive—not only offering SOL price exposure but also seeking to distribute on-chain staking yields to investors.

This was a daring move. The SEC has long viewed staking services as securities offerings, but Bitwise clearly labeled its S-1 filing as a “Staking ETF,” aiming to create a compliant structure for distributing staking rewards. If successful, the Solana ETF would capture both price appreciation and dividend-like cash flow, making it far more attractive than yield-less Bitcoin ETFs.

Another point of contention: Solana didn’t have a CME futures contract. Historically, this would have been grounds for SEC rejection. However, regulators allowed it, likely acknowledging that the long trading history on regulated exchanges like Coinbase provided sufficient price discovery.

Market performance was equally impressive.

According to SoSoValue, Solana ETFs recorded 20 straight days of net inflows since launch, totaling $568 million. While Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs saw significant outflows in November, Solana ETFs attracted capital against the trend. By the end of November, the six Solana funds managed $843 million in assets, about 1.09% of SOL’s market cap.

This shows institutional capital is rotating out of crowded Bitcoin trades and seeking new assets with higher beta and growth potential.

03

XRP ETF: Value Reassessment After Regulatory Settlement

XRP’s ETF journey was long blocked by Ripple Labs’ legal battle with the SEC. After a settlement in August 2025, the uncertainty over XRP was finally lifted, triggering a wave of ETF applications.

By November, five XRP ETFs had launched or were about to launch:

• Bitwise’s XRP ETF, listed November 20, used “XRP” as its trading symbol—a bold marketing move that sparked debate. Some called it a genius way to help retail investors find the product; others worried it would confuse the underlying asset with the derivative fund.
• Canary’s XRPC was first to market on November 13, with a record $243 million in first-day inflows.
• Grayscale’s GXRP, listed November 24, was converted from a trust, eliminating discount/premium issues.

Despite strong initial inflows, XRP’s price faced short-term pressure after the ETFs launched. Following Bitwise ETF’s debut, XRP dropped about 7.6% in a few days, at one point falling over 18%. This was classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” behavior—speculators bought ahead of approval and sold once the news was official. Macro factors, like strong jobs data weakening rate-cut expectations, also weighed on risk assets. In the long run, however, ETFs are bringing steady passive inflows to XRP. Cumulative net inflows to XRP ETFs have surpassed $587 million since launch. While speculators are exiting, institutional allocators are stepping in, building a higher long-term price floor for XRP.

Dogecoin ETF: From Meme to Asset Class

The launch of Dogecoin ETFs marks a major turning point: Wall Street is now recognizing “meme coins,” driven by community consensus and network effects, as legitimate investment vehicles.

Currently, there are three Dogecoin-related products:

• Grayscale’s GDOG, listed November 24;
• Bitwise’s BWOW, with an 8(a) application awaiting automatic effectiveness;
• 21Shares’ TXXD, a 2x leveraged product for high-risk investors.

Market response has been muted. GDOG’s first-day trading volume was just $1.41 million, with no net inflows. This likely reflects Dogecoin’s highly retail-driven investor base, who prefer holding tokens directly on exchanges rather than paying ETF management fees. Still, the market expects Bitwise’s BWOW—with lower fees and stronger marketing—to unlock institutional demand in this segment.

Next Wave: Litecoin, HBAR, and BNB

Beyond the three leading altcoins, Litecoin, Hedera (HBAR), and BNB are also actively pursuing ETF status.

Litecoin, as a Bitcoin code fork, is closest to BTC in regulatory terms and is treated as a commodity. Canary Capital filed for an ETF in October 2024 and submitted Form 8-A (the final exchange registration step) on October 27, 2025, signaling that LTC ETF approval is imminent.

HBAR ETF applications are led by Canary, with Grayscale following. The key breakthrough was Coinbase Derivatives’ launch of a CFTC-regulated HBAR futures contract in February 2025, providing the regulatory foundation for HBAR to meet the “universal listing standard.” NASDAQ has received Grayscale’s 19b-4 filing, suggesting HBAR is likely to be the next approved asset.

BNB is the most challenging case. VanEck filed an S-1 application for VBNB, but given BNB’s close ties to Binance and Binance’s complex regulatory history in the US, the BNB ETF is seen as the ultimate test of the SEC’s new leadership.

The “Crypto Multiplier” Effect: Liquidity’s Double-Edged Sword

The arrival of altcoin ETFs is more than just adding new investment tickers—it is structurally transforming the market through capital flows.

Research from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) introduced the “crypto multiplier” concept: the market cap response of crypto assets to inflows is nonlinear. For altcoins with much lower liquidity than Bitcoin, institutional capital via ETFs could cause major price shocks.

According to Kaiko, Bitcoin’s 1% market depth recently stood at $535 million, while most altcoins have only a fraction of that. This means comparable inflows—such as Bitwise’s $105 million first-day inflow to its XRP ETF—should, in theory, have a much larger price impact on XRP than on BTC.

The current “sell the news” phenomenon is masking this effect. Market makers must buy spot assets to create ETF shares, but if sentiment is bearish, they may hedge by shorting futures or offloading inventory OTC, temporarily capping spot price gains.

As ETF assets accumulate, however, this passive buying will gradually drain exchange liquidity, leading to more intense and upward-biased price swings in the future.

Market Stratification: A New Valuation System

The launch of ETFs has deepened liquidity stratification in the crypto market:

First tier (ETF assets): BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, DOGE. These assets have compliant fiat onramps, and registered investment advisors (RIAs) and pension funds can allocate to them freely. They enjoy a “compliance premium” and lower liquidity risk.

Second tier (non-ETF assets): other Layer 1 and DeFi tokens. Without ETF channels, these assets remain reliant on retail capital and on-chain liquidity. Their correlation with mainstream assets may weaken, putting them at risk of marginalization.

This divergence will reshape crypto valuation logic, shifting from speculation-driven to a multipolar system based on compliance channels and institutional allocation.

Summary

The late-2025 altcoin ETF wave marks a decisive step as crypto assets move from “fringe speculation” to “mainstream allocation.”

By skillfully leveraging the “universal listing standard” and “8(a) clause,” issuers broke through SEC resistance and brought once-controversial assets like Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin to regulated exchanges.

This not only opened compliant capital channels for these assets, but more importantly, gave de facto legal recognition to their “non-security” status.

Despite short-term profit-taking pressure, as institutional investors begin allocating 1%-5% portfolio weights to these assets, structural inflows will inevitably drive up the valuations of these “digital commodities.”

Over the next 6-12 months, expect more assets—such as Avalanche and Chainlink—to pursue the same path.

In a multipolar crypto market, ETFs are becoming the defining line between “core” and “peripheral” assets.

For investors, this transformation brings not just new opportunities, but a complete reshaping of the market landscape: a market once driven by speculation and narrative is evolving toward a new order anchored in compliance and institutional allocation.

This shift is now irreversible.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is reprinted from [Plain Language Blockchain], with copyright belonging to the original author [Clow]. If you have any concerns about this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and we will address the issue promptly according to relevant procedures.
2. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute investment advice.
3. Other language versions of this article are translated by the Gate Learn team. Do not copy, distribute, or plagiarize the translated article without mentioning Gate.