Cross-chain transactions shouldn't be this complicated. Some routing aggregators can automatically handle cross-chain execution and liquidity discovery, allowing you to switch seamlessly between different chains as if it were a single transaction—completely不用 worry about which pool the liquidity is in. Try it on emerging public chains like LightLink, and enjoy a similar swap experience, but with the freedom to allocate cross-chain assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SocialFiQueen
· 10h ago
Cross-chain aggregators are indeed great, but everyone who has actually used them knows that slippage can still be quite annoying. Is the liquidity on LightLink really deep enough?
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 10h ago
Cross-chain aggregation is really impressive, but how's the liquidity on LightLink? Probably have to wait for the ecosystem to develop again.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 10h ago
Cross-chain aggregation is really comfortable, but does LightLink really have that much liquidity? Or are they just storytelling again?
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 10h ago
Cross-chain aggregators are indeed comfortable, but what about the gas fees? That's really troublesome.
Cross-chain transactions shouldn't be this complicated. Some routing aggregators can automatically handle cross-chain execution and liquidity discovery, allowing you to switch seamlessly between different chains as if it were a single transaction—completely不用 worry about which pool the liquidity is in. Try it on emerging public chains like LightLink, and enjoy a similar swap experience, but with the freedom to allocate cross-chain assets.