Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—the 52-week price correlation between Bitcoin and gold has dropped to zero for the first time since mid-2022. Even more interesting is that, according to current trends, these two assets are likely to turn negative correlation again before the end of January.
You ask what this means? History shows that whenever this happens, Bitcoin usually experiences a strong rally.
Looking back at past records, the correlation between Bitcoin and gold has turned negative four times, three of which were quite powerful—on average, Bitcoin increased by 56% within two months. The only "failure" occurred in May 2021, when Bitcoin actually fell by 26%. What was happening then? A major car manufacturer paused accepting Bitcoin payments, and a certain country intensified its crackdown on mining, forcing the market to de-leverage and suppressing the original bullish signals.
But the current situation is different. The macro environment is clearly more favorable—global liquidity is rebounding (just look at M2 money supply), and a major central bank’s quantitative tightening (QT) is nearing completion. A global research director at an asset management firm recently pointed out that, based on historical experience, Bitcoin’s bull market cycles are usually synchronized with global liquidity expansion.
The new round of global easing has just begun, and central banks are about to stop QT. If history repeats itself, the growth rate of global liquidity should see a noticeable improvement, and the impact on market sentiment will be significant.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetective
· 9h ago
Buddy, the data is back again. A 56% increase sounds real, but that direct slap in the face in 2021 makes me cautious.
---
It's another liquidity story. Every time it's told this way, I just want to see if the central bank really stops QT.
---
What does the negative correlation indicate? Is the crypto world really starting to split from traditional finance?
---
Historically, three times it was strong, once it was a letdown. I’m not brave enough to go all in on these odds, but it’s definitely interesting.
---
The rebound in M2 is key, but most people entering now have a gambling mindset. How much liquidity can really improve is hard to say.
---
This logical chain is a bit weak, lacking discussion of black swan risks.
---
Wait, is the decoupling of Bitcoin and gold really a good thing, or does it indicate some other issue?
---
Following this reasoning, we should see some movement before the end of the year. Marking it here.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 9h ago
Here we go again with this correlation argument. The May 2021 wave directly slapped that down. The probability of history repeating itself is not as high as you think.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 9h ago
A 56% increase sounds good, but that reverse operation in May 2021 was really heartbreaking... Black swan events come unexpectedly.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 9h ago
56% increase? To be honest, that's a bit optimistic, but this time the macro situation is indeed different.
---
Once again, it's the same old story of historical patterns. I haven't forgotten the lessons from May 2021.
---
Liquidity recovery is real, but don't expect to see significant gains by the end of January. We're still in the accumulation phase.
---
The central bank's halt of QT needs to actually happen; promises without action are just talk.
---
Negative correlation appears, and I am optimistic about this wave. Going all-in might be a stretch, but increasing positions is definitely worth considering.
---
Does Bitcoin follow liquidity? I believe in that logic; M2 won't deceive.
---
That time in 2021 was truly an unlucky streak. Hopefully, there are no more black swans now.
Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon—the 52-week price correlation between Bitcoin and gold has dropped to zero for the first time since mid-2022. Even more interesting is that, according to current trends, these two assets are likely to turn negative correlation again before the end of January.
You ask what this means? History shows that whenever this happens, Bitcoin usually experiences a strong rally.
Looking back at past records, the correlation between Bitcoin and gold has turned negative four times, three of which were quite powerful—on average, Bitcoin increased by 56% within two months. The only "failure" occurred in May 2021, when Bitcoin actually fell by 26%. What was happening then? A major car manufacturer paused accepting Bitcoin payments, and a certain country intensified its crackdown on mining, forcing the market to de-leverage and suppressing the original bullish signals.
But the current situation is different. The macro environment is clearly more favorable—global liquidity is rebounding (just look at M2 money supply), and a major central bank’s quantitative tightening (QT) is nearing completion. A global research director at an asset management firm recently pointed out that, based on historical experience, Bitcoin’s bull market cycles are usually synchronized with global liquidity expansion.
The new round of global easing has just begun, and central banks are about to stop QT. If history repeats itself, the growth rate of global liquidity should see a noticeable improvement, and the impact on market sentiment will be significant.