Looking at $AGI's tokenomics through the lens of devsnightmare's analysis, here's what stands out: the project maintains a clean distribution with no snipers, insiders holding just 2.2% and team allocations at 2.4%. The real story lies in the major holder composition—zhynx, WaiterG, yukaz, Doops, and OGAntD lead the pack. What caught attention though is the cluster activity around WaiterG's wallet address timing, which controls 7.1% of supply. There's another time-linked cluster with 2.5%, plus additional holdings concentrated in specific addresses. This kind of holder distribution tracking matters when you're evaluating whether a project has genuine decentralization or potential concentration risks.