Everyone's talking about 'alignment' in NFTs these days. The concept sounds good in theory—creators and holders working toward the same goals, balancing incentives and motivations. But here's the thing: the more you hear a term repeated across the space, the more suspicious it gets. Is real alignment actually achievable, or are we just using it as a comfort blanket? The gap between intention and execution keeps getting wider.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamervip
· 2h ago
The word "alignment" is now tired and just nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 2h ago
To put it simply, the word "alignment" is now just a cover-up; the more enthusiastically it's discussed, the more it indicates bigger problems.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 2h ago
That whole alignment thing, the more I hear, the more absurd it gets. It sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just a mess.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSatsvip
· 2h ago
ngl alignment is now just a gimmick; the more I hear about it, the more I think it's nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 2h ago
That whole NFT alignment talk has given me ear calluses; it's really just a comfort blanket.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)