Can you really call it a DEX if the whole thing runs on centralized infrastructure? It's a funny contradiction when you think about it—decentralized exchange that actually isn't decentralized. The name doesn't match the mechanics. Some platforms claim they're decentralized while making all the key decisions from a central authority. That kind of defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it? If you're relying on servers and governance controlled by a single entity, what's the difference from a regular exchange? The crypto space keeps running into this same tension: projects that talk the decentralization talk but don't walk the walk. Worth questioning whether those platforms are living up to what DEX actually means.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTrader
· 1h ago
It's the same old story, masquerading as a DEX when it's actually just a centralized exchange in disguise.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 12h ago
nah this is exactly why i've wasted so much gas migrating between "decentralized" platforms that turned out to be just rebranded cexes lol... the infrastructure cost doesn't even justify the centralization fraud tbh
Reply0
SerumSquirter
· 12h ago
Uh... isn't this just a centralized exchange disguised as a DEX? LOL
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 12h ago
This is a typical flaw in mechanism design: called DEX but actually centralized decision-making, with incentives misaligned to the core. I've seen too many projects crash like this; sooner or later, something will go wrong.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 12h ago
Laughing out loud, a centralized exchange claiming to be decentralized— isn't that just a joke?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 12h ago
Basically, it's just pretending to be a DEX to scam users, doing centralized work very skillfully.
View OriginalReply0
MevTears
· 12h ago
Isn't this just an exchange in disguise? How dare they call it a DEX.
Can you really call it a DEX if the whole thing runs on centralized infrastructure? It's a funny contradiction when you think about it—decentralized exchange that actually isn't decentralized. The name doesn't match the mechanics. Some platforms claim they're decentralized while making all the key decisions from a central authority. That kind of defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it? If you're relying on servers and governance controlled by a single entity, what's the difference from a regular exchange? The crypto space keeps running into this same tension: projects that talk the decentralization talk but don't walk the walk. Worth questioning whether those platforms are living up to what DEX actually means.