2026-01-10 14:25:28

Telecom tokens have quite the track record in the crypto space. Whether you're looking at the controversial chapters of this industry or searching for solid investment opportunities, this one definitely stands out. The project carries significant historical weight—it's been through cycles that most newer tokens haven't experienced. For those betting on established protocols with deep market history, there's something worth considering here. The combination of longevity and market presence makes it an intriguing position to evaluate, especially if you're into projects that have proven their staying power through multiple market phases.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemeEchoer

· 01-11 03:07

Are you talking about telecom tokens? They've been around for a long time, and having witnessed numerous bull and bear cycles, they are indeed different. --- Having a long history also means what? Can they turn things around this time? --- Honestly, it still depends on the team and ecosystem. Having history alone is useless. --- Probably a regular in bankruptcy discussion groups haha, but on the other hand, surviving until now really shows some skill. --- I usually just look at these old projects without much interest. --- It's that kind of "worth considering" excuse again, just be straightforward. --- They've survived several cycles, showing good resilience, but the risks are also significant. --- The market has already given these old coins a chance; now it's time for a new narrative.

View OriginalReply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 01-10 19:13

Ha, it's that same old argument of "long history = reliable." Does an old project necessarily mean it's good? Tokens that have gone through multiple cycles can also die. Don't be fooled by the story. Can this really withstand the next bear market? Or is it just marketing talk? Old projects are not necessarily better than new ones; sometimes they're just barely hanging on. A long history is indeed a plus, but you still need to manage the risks yourself. This kind of reasoning of "I've been around longer, so I'm awesome" always feels a bit off. Deep market history ≠ future returns. Don't be brainwashed by past performance.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityJester

· 01-10 14:53

Hmm... It sounds like we're talking about old projects lasting a long time, but does that really mean anything? They've been around for so many years but haven't taken off; it might just be a "survivor bias." A long history doesn't necessarily mean it's worth investing in; that logic is a bit shaky. Old antiques aren't necessarily gold; sometimes, nobody wants them. Having persisted for so long, is it faith or being trapped? Thinking of those projects that have been around for ten years and are still in a slump, it's quite awkward.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-10 14:50

Is it true that this telecom coin has really been alive for so long? I have to see it with my own eyes to believe it.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-10 14:48

It's the same old story... After going through so many bear markets and still surviving, it's either survivor bias or really having some skills. Living long ≠ worth buying, but you definitely need to keep an eye on it. I heard someone bought a lot at the low point, now they're looking for a rebound opportunity. These antique coins are all about betting stories. I'll wait for a deeper dip before considering. By the way, this thing has been around for so long, why does it still have so little influence...

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-10 14:45

Telecom coins, as long as they last long enough, that's fine. Anyway, I don't touch them. --- A long history ≠ worth investing. I'm tired of this line of reasoning. --- It's "worth mentioning" again, but you should clarify how to invest. --- Enduring a few cycles is indeed tough, but that's not a reason to buy. --- There are many projects that have been around the longest in the industry. What's so special about telecom coins? --- A deep market history? Please don't gild old projects. --- Are you talking about project stability or saying the project has no innovation?

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-10 14:33

After all these years, I'm still alive, and just for that reason alone, it's worth taking a look.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-10 14:31

Still around after all this time? There’s definitely something there. --- Honestly, not many projects survive through so many bear markets, this one is indeed tough. --- Wait, Telecom Coin? If I remember correctly, this thing caused quite a stir before. --- Mature protocol? Ha, let’s see if it survives this round first. --- Old history = worth investing? That’s a bit of a weak logic, huh. --- I’d like to see how many projects that have lasted through multiple cycles are still around. --- Projects that survive multiple cycles are either truly valuable or just too resilient. --- For these old projects, I usually look at the holder composition. Too many retail investors, and I’m out. --- You can’t just look at the history; the key is what innovations they have now. --- Let me see how the trading pair liquidity looks before saying more.

View OriginalReply0