The US's demonstrated capabilities in algorithms + intelligence + decapitation against Venezuela are only applicable to specific types of opponents:
Highly personalized power, security systems closely tied to individuals, internal loyalty issues, and decision-making concentrated in a few nodes.
Venezuela is just one example.
Of course, for nuclear powers, such capabilities would not be used in this way, but they still serve as a verifiable deterrent tool.
Because the US military doesn't need to take real action, only to make the other side believe:
I know where you are, know when you're most vulnerable, and have the ability to strike.
This in itself will:
Change the opponent's behavior Increase their security costs Restrict their diplomatic/military actions
It could even serve as the last option before war with a nuclear power.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The US's demonstrated capabilities in algorithms + intelligence + decapitation against Venezuela are only applicable to specific types of opponents:
Highly personalized power, security systems closely tied to individuals, internal loyalty issues, and decision-making concentrated in a few nodes.
Venezuela is just one example.
Of course, for nuclear powers, such capabilities would not be used in this way, but they still serve as a verifiable deterrent tool.
Because the US military doesn't need to take real action, only to make the other side believe:
I know where you are, know when you're most vulnerable, and have the ability to strike.
This in itself will:
Change the opponent's behavior
Increase their security costs
Restrict their diplomatic/military actions
It could even serve as the last option before war with a nuclear power.