The leading project in the oracle track was once considered the "certainty premium"—the hub connecting on-chain and off-chain data, embraced by institutions, accumulated by major players, and regarded as the cornerstone of DeFi. When discussing ecological prosperity, it’s hard to avoid mentioning its name.
But in this cycle, the wind has shifted.
To be honest, the news isn’t bad. Over the past month, major players have quietly been accumulating, with single transactions approaching the tens of millions of dollars. The new narrative of "real-world assets," combined with the capital support from derivatives ETFs, has occasionally driven a price rebound. Fundamentally, ecological collaborations are also progressing, and the project itself remains active.
But here’s the problem—price movement is soft.
Compared to other leading tokens and hot coins, this once-market darling seems out of place. It’s not a decline, but a heavy feeling—as if something is pressing down on it, remembered but unable to rise. The technical charts also confirm this dilemma: MACD intermittently flashes buy signals, showing some short-term warmth; but the medium- and long-term moving averages are always pressing down, blocking it from above. The sharp momentum that once led the market and the sector? It’s long gone.
It’s still operational, but amid the market’s turbulence, this "steady iteration" feels too quiet. So quiet that it’s almost forgotten.
This brings us back to the core question: when buying it now, are we paying for a technology that, while indeed useful, may have already reached its growth ceiling? Or are we betting on something else?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWanderingPoet
· 12h ago
Really, the certainty premium used to be, now it's become a certainty trap, hilarious. Big players may buy up, but the price just can't go up. How strong must that mentality be?
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 12h ago
Really, the once top-tier player is now just relying on its past reputation. No matter how good the news is, it can't change the feeling of being suppressed.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 12h ago
Even a big whale spending tens of millions of dollars can't save it, this is just ridiculous haha
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 12h ago
This is the ceiling, right? No matter how good the technology is, if no one promotes it, it's just worthless paper.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 12h ago
Touching the ceiling is really uncomfortable, so let's wait for the next opportunity.
The leading project in the oracle track was once considered the "certainty premium"—the hub connecting on-chain and off-chain data, embraced by institutions, accumulated by major players, and regarded as the cornerstone of DeFi. When discussing ecological prosperity, it’s hard to avoid mentioning its name.
But in this cycle, the wind has shifted.
To be honest, the news isn’t bad. Over the past month, major players have quietly been accumulating, with single transactions approaching the tens of millions of dollars. The new narrative of "real-world assets," combined with the capital support from derivatives ETFs, has occasionally driven a price rebound. Fundamentally, ecological collaborations are also progressing, and the project itself remains active.
But here’s the problem—price movement is soft.
Compared to other leading tokens and hot coins, this once-market darling seems out of place. It’s not a decline, but a heavy feeling—as if something is pressing down on it, remembered but unable to rise. The technical charts also confirm this dilemma: MACD intermittently flashes buy signals, showing some short-term warmth; but the medium- and long-term moving averages are always pressing down, blocking it from above. The sharp momentum that once led the market and the sector? It’s long gone.
It’s still operational, but amid the market’s turbulence, this "steady iteration" feels too quiet. So quiet that it’s almost forgotten.
This brings us back to the core question: when buying it now, are we paying for a technology that, while indeed useful, may have already reached its growth ceiling? Or are we betting on something else?