The local IPO market is facing a real squeeze. Companies aren't lining up to go public domestically anymore—they're voting with their feet and heading overseas to chase better valuations.
Here's what's happening: when startups have a choice between listing at home versus international markets, the math is often brutal. Overseas exchanges and investors are throwing bigger valuation multiples at the same companies. Why settle for a local bid when you can get 2x or 3x more from foreign capital?
This capital flight trend creates a nasty feedback loop. Fewer listings means less market activity, which means institutional investors have less reason to stick around. The dried-up pipeline makes it even harder for the next batch of companies to find buyers at competitive prices.
The irony? This phenomenon isn't unique. It's playing out in emerging markets globally. When your home market can't match international valuations, it's tough to convince ambitious founders to stay.
The real question is whether local exchanges can adapt—maybe through regulatory reforms, tax incentives, or building better investor bases. Without intervention, expect this drought to stick around until the economics change.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyUpOnly
· 4h ago
Honestly, this is the cruelty of capital... Who would be foolish enough to be undervalued at home? A 2-3 times valuation gap, if I were the founder, I would run.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 7h ago
To be honest, local IPOs are just being beaten by international capital, there's no other way. The founders aren't fools; who would sell cheap goods at their doorstep when they can earn 2-3 times more?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYield
· 7h ago
lol the correlation matrix here is predictable as always... domestic markets getting arb'd out of existence. classic liquidity crisis setup
Reply0
AirdropHunter007
· 7h ago
NGL, this is the ruthless reality of capital. Who would still foolishly go for a local listing... The valuation given by the international market is indeed aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 7h ago
NGL, this is the survival of the fittest in the market. If local exchanges don't take real action soon, they'll just have to watch the big investors run away.
The local IPO market is facing a real squeeze. Companies aren't lining up to go public domestically anymore—they're voting with their feet and heading overseas to chase better valuations.
Here's what's happening: when startups have a choice between listing at home versus international markets, the math is often brutal. Overseas exchanges and investors are throwing bigger valuation multiples at the same companies. Why settle for a local bid when you can get 2x or 3x more from foreign capital?
This capital flight trend creates a nasty feedback loop. Fewer listings means less market activity, which means institutional investors have less reason to stick around. The dried-up pipeline makes it even harder for the next batch of companies to find buyers at competitive prices.
The irony? This phenomenon isn't unique. It's playing out in emerging markets globally. When your home market can't match international valuations, it's tough to convince ambitious founders to stay.
The real question is whether local exchanges can adapt—maybe through regulatory reforms, tax incentives, or building better investor bases. Without intervention, expect this drought to stick around until the economics change.