This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationTherapist
· 3h ago
Honestly, are there still few people who vomit blood watching K-line charts? Every day they review the results but still get smashed.
This black technology prediction set... sounds pretty impressive, but it feels like just another money-grabbing scheme for the little guys.
If the predictions were reliable, someone would have achieved financial freedom long ago. Why do we still need $GLNT to save us?
This round of hype, will they be hyping something else next round?
Forget it, I’ll just continue my liquidation therapy—it's more reliable than anything else.
Anyway, technical analysis can't save me, and prediction systems can't save me either. It all comes down to mindset.
If predictions were truly accurate, would we even need to know?
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 3h ago
Trend prediction sounds great, but who can guarantee it's not just a collection of false signals? What about risk control thresholds?
The story of consecutive liquidations is happening every day, and I don't believe this system can escape the poison hand of market sentiment.
Black technology system? Honestly, it's still about data feeding; if the data is wrong, the liquidation price is directly maxed out.
The term "forward-looking judgment"... I've heard it too many times, and in the end, it's all about deleveraging to survive.
$GLNT no matter how awesome, can't escape the curse of volatility; systemic risk is right there.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 3h ago
Well said, I am the kind of person who has been tortured by candlestick charts to the point of doubting life...
Can cutting-edge technology predictions really handle the market? Feels like a new scam to cut leeks again
Trend prediction vs. historical review, sounds good but depends on actual performance
If the $GLNT logic really works, no one would bother doing traditional analysis anymore
Those with strong predictive abilities have long achieved financial freedom, why are they still here issuing tokens
Things like this always make money for believers, while users get lessons...
From passive to active, ultimately it still depends on people's judgment
New ideas are quite tempting, but we still need to stay cautious
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 3h ago
That's right, talking about candlestick charts is just self-deception; the market is still as brutal as ever.
---
Trend prediction sounds good, but can it really beat the market? I remain skeptical.
---
Black technology and predictions again; I've heard this spiel too many times.
---
From review to prediction? Come on, if it were that simple, no one would be losing money.
---
If $GLNT can break through, I’ll be convinced—provided it doesn’t turn into the next cash cow.
---
I disagree that historical data is useless; it all depends on how you use it.
---
Predicting the market? Ha, that's a huge joke; no one can do it.
---
Feels like there's another new narrative emerging; this bull market probably still has many new tricks up its sleeve.
---
Proactive prediction sounds great, but in practice, it still comes down to luck.
---
There are plenty of signals, but even more false signals—that's the real problem.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 3h ago
It's the same old spiel again, predicting with black technology, how many times have I heard this...
Prediction is essentially a game of probabilities, can GLNT guarantee accuracy?
Historical charts do have issues, but if they dare to boast about avoiding false signals, I just lol.
It sounds like they're selling expectations. If they could truly predict stably, everyone would be rich overnight.
Feels like this is just the next new concept to cut the chives...
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 4h ago
Looking at another "black technology" story, sounds impressive, but in the end, you still have to pay the tuition fee.
Predicting market trends? I still believe in probability and risk control. Don't overhype these tools.
It feels like everyone is selling the "next watershed," but if it were really that powerful, there would be no need to promote it with articles.
Trend prediction sounds good, but the premise is that this system itself isn't just a fantasy.
Another one claiming to "break free from historical limitations." Wake up, behind the market movements are human hearts.
历史K线能预测未来吗?很多人还在用落后的技术分析被市场反复教训。
Glint项目换了个思路——与其沉溺于历史图表的回溯分析,不如直接看趋势预测。这套黑科技系统摆脱了传统历史数据的局限,主打的是前瞻性判断,帮你在市场噪音和虚假信号中找到真正的信号。
$GLNT正在试图重新定义加密市场的数据使用逻辑。从被动复盘到主动预判,思路的升级也许才是下一波交易员的分水岭。